Burundi's proposal favors criminal justice

13 March 2006 by Thierry Cruvellier and Didace Kanyugu

Six months after the new government took power in Burundi, little headway has been made in the negotiations with the UN on setting up institutions to render justice for crimes committed over the past four decades. However, a still confidential government document gives a preliminary indication of the Burundian authorities' choices. Bujumbura's proposed truth and reconciliation commission and special court appear to be surprisingly expansive and firm-handed.


On June 21, 2005, the UN Security Council recommended setting up a two-part mechanism to establish the facts and determine those responsible in Burundi. The UN proposed creating both a truth commission, promised by the 2000 peace agreement, and a special criminal chamber within the country's court system. Anxious to set this process in motion before the last summer general elections, the UN imposed a tight schedule and the general secretariat was to publish a report by September 30.

In the meantime, however, the Burundian political landscape changed radically. The Conseil National pour la Défense de la Démocratie - Forces nationales pour la Défense de la Démocratie (CNDD-FDD), the main rebel political-military force in the 1990s, won the general elections in a landslide victory. At the end of July, the transition government that had officially agreed to the UN recommendation was merely ensuring the day-to-day operations of the government. When the September 30 deadline rolled around, the UN recognized the need to slow down and give the newly-elected CNDD-FDD government time to reflect.

Want to read more?

We have tailor-made memberships for students, individuals, groups of professionals and large companies and organizations. A subscription entitles you to receive the International Justice Tribune every two weeks as well as become a member of the Justice Tribune Foundation, supporting independent reporting on international justice.

Subscribe now

Related articles

article
06 November 2006 by Thierry Cruvellier

More than a year after the CNDD-FDD party came to power in Bujumbura, negotiations between the Burundian government and the UN on the creation of semi-international legal institutions have come to a standstill. The criminal proceedings mechanism envisaged by the United Nations has been rejected by the new government, which is responsible for an increasing number of human rights violations. The government feels that the chief objective of the second mechanism, a truth and reconciliation commission, should henceforth be to pardon, which the UN views as amnesty. Thus the hope for justice for mass crimes committed in Burundi over the past forty years seems to be dwindling.

article
06 October 2010 by Stef Vandeginste

With a successfully completed peace process followed by general elections in the summer of 2010, the case of Burundi seemingly contradicted the conventional wisdom that there can be no peace without justice. In fact, despite a rhetorical commitment to establishing transitional justice mechanisms, no action has so far been undertaken to end impunity for past human rights crimes.

article
24 March 2010 by Don Kirk

South Korea’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), founded in 2005 as an independent agency with a broad mandate to cover a century of abuse, faces dissolution by the country’s conservative government. The TRC is likely to last another few months wrapping up investigations and then fade away, a relic of the decade of liberal leadership that began with the inauguration of President Kim Dae-jung in February 1998.

article
10 July 2006 by Didace Kanyugu

A United Nations delegation traveled to Bujumbura from March 27-31 to continue negotiations in writing with the Burundian government with a view to establishing a Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) and a Special Tribunal. On May 19, the UN Under-Secretary-General for Legal Affairs laid out the main points to be discussed. The Burundian government responded on June 15. The negotiations appear to center on the scope of the criminal proceedings and the issue of oversight.

article
24 August 2010 by Bram Posthumus

Former Liberian president Charles Taylor, is in court to defend himself on 11 counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity he allegedly committed in Liberia’s neighbour to the west, Sierra Leone. Liberian media cover the trial extensively but Liberians are, to all intents and purposes, mere spectators. This trial is not about them. Liberia lacks a war crimes tribunal. What it does have is a Truth and Reconciliation Commission which has been taking countless statements from war crimes victims and perpetrators and whose report is in the public domain.