Philippines and Venezuela: A move away from armed conflict for ICC?

09 February 2018 by Stephanie van den Berg

The International Criminal Court (ICC) took another step this week away from its much-criticized Africa focus that could take the court beyond armed conflict situations and into the tactics used in peacetime by state security forces and police against alleged drug gangs and attacks on dissidents when it announced it was opening preliminary examinations in the Philippines and Venezuela.

On Thursday the ICC prosecutor said she was looking into the alleged killing of thousands of people during the Philippines' "war on drugs" since July 2016. Reports say some 4,000 people, mostly from poor urban backgrounds were killed by police in the past 19 months during what the government calls the “war on drugs”. In a statement prosecutor Fatou Bensouda said that “it is alleged that many of the reported incidents involved extra-judicial killings in the course of police anti-drug operations”.

Bensouda had already warned last year that “extra-judicial killings may fall under the jurisdiction of the ICC if they are committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population pursuant to a state policy to commit such an attack”. For these killings to fall under ICC jurisdiction there doesn’t have to be an armed conflict because for crimes against humanity just a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population would be enough.

In the same announcement the prosecutor said it opened a preliminary examination into the alleged use of "excessive force" by the state security forces of Venezuela since last April. Last year the government of leftist President Nicolas Maduro faced months of protests. Human rights organizations have said report over 5,000 people were detained and 757 prosecuted in military courts, with 124 deaths.

The ICC prosecutor says it will analyse crimes committed in Venezuela since April 2017 including allegations of the use of excessive force by government forces and the arrest and detention of thousands of alleged opposition members “a number of whom would have been allegedly subjected to serious abuse and ill-treatment in detention”. She added that she would also look into reports that some protesters also resorted to violence resulting in security force members being injured or killed.

The preliminary examinations in Venezuela and the Philippines could pave the way to similar probes in Mexico where NGO’s have been urging the court for years to look into the tens of thousands of disappearances and hundreds of thousands deaths linked to drugs violence in battles between the cartels themselves and state security services. Human rights watchdog FIDH has also filed communications with the ICC to urge them to open an investigation into land grabbing in member state Cambodia committed by government members and security forces . They added Bangladesh, court member since 2010, as another example of a state party where activist allege peacetime mass violations of the Rome Statute linked to forced disappearances and illegal detention of opposition figures.

 With no new arrestees or cases on the docket in The Hague, preliminary examinations have been the most interesting area of the prosecutor’s work in recent months. But some observers have warned that the court risks looking like yet another commission of inquiry if it fails to actually bring alleged perpetrators to justice.

Philippines president Rodrigo Duterte shows a copy of a diagram showing the connection of high level drug syndicates (Photo: Flickr/KING RODRIGUEZ/Presidential Photographers Division)

Related articles

19 February 2007 by Laetitia Grotti

One year ago on January 6, 2006, the 17 members of Morocco's Equity and Reconciliation Commission (IER) were closing up shop after submitting their final report to King Mohammed VI. The Moroccan truth commission had received a flood of compliments from the international community praising the recommendations in its report, especially those advocating legislative and constitutional reforms. One year later, however, the results have been rather mixed.

11 September 2006 by our correspondent in Arusha

After having tried high-ranking officers, ministers, businessmen, priests, journalists, local officials and militiamen, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) is in uncharted waters. On September 11, the most famous rwandese troubadour of his generation will stand trial for genocide. 

23 October 2006 by Christine Chaumeau

China is keeping a polite distance from international criminal justice. Beijing is hardly disinterested, but China does want to make sure that these new global mechanisms are not going to infringe upon its sovereignty by delving into particularly sensitive cases such as Tibet. 

United Nations Operation in Burundi disarms rebel forces in Mbanda in February 2005 (Photo: Flickr/UN Photo/Martine Perret)
03 June 2015 by Janet H. Anderson, The Hague (The Netherlands)

Over the last month, Burundi has hit the headlines as the president put himself forward to be elected for a controversial third term, resulting in street protests, thousands of refugees who fled instability and an attempted coup. Behind the issues of elections and constitutionalism are also those of justice following Burundi’s long-running civil war. The international community supported an intensive process of negotiation and the signing of the Arusha Accord in 2000. But in the decade and a half since, its provisions on justice have been debated though never fully implemented.

06 November 2006 by Pierre Hazan

France's attitude towards international criminal justice is marked by ambiguity. Paris subscribes to a vision of the world in which international humanitarian law is considered a way to curb violence against civilian populations, but at the same time it is wary of an unchecked judicial system that could end up prosecuting French soldiers engaged in areas where it has old and deep-rooted interests.